THE Q EFFECT

Was it a psyop to wake up the masses or to entrap passionate protestors?

Q Surveillance

---

Disclaimer: This article is all conjecture and it attempts to look at Q/Trump from a different angle. The ability to ask questions is the greatest resource in possibly learning the truth.

---

When thinking about the overall effect Q had on the population, many people resort to saying it was positive because it woke up so many. The people that say this don’t really understand the history of the internet and the truth movement that was being created way before Q. These pre-Q movements weren’t aligned politically left or right because it was just a group of people searching for the truth.

This was a big problem to the establishment because these movements were grass root started by the public themselves. The establishment couldn’t control it because these people were communicating through the internet and weren’t monetarily driven. And lastly these individuals were all anonymous users online.

So it’s possible the establishment came up with a plan and supplied these truthers with a hero, hoping they would bite.

“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves” - Vladimir Lenin

9/11

To understand the possible purpose of Q, we have to understand who the real threat to the elites are. Imagine you’re one the elites who treats the world like a game of chess who operates in the shadows? What is the one thing they would fear the most?

For good hearted people to expose them for who they truly are.

The most powerful tool that these good hearted people have is the internet and prior to Q, they were causing major panic within the elite’s circles. For instance, after the 9/11 terrorists attacks the ‘9/11 Truth Movement’ rose up and started asking questions about the possibility of the building falling due to controlled demolition. A group called the ‘Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’ created a report in 2006 that called for a re-evaluation of the buildings collapse.

This ground up movement could have never started if it wasn’t for the internet and good hearted truth seekers.

When looking at the 9/11 attacks from outside the box, we can see this was the catalyst for Americans hatred towards the Islamic world and the Bush era wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. So the idea that the American Government was somehow involved isn’t far-fetched.

Also the ‘Patriot Act’ was signed into law on October 26th, 2001. The Patriot Act was enacted following the September 11 attacks and the 2001 anthrax attacks with the stated goal of tightening U.S. national security, particularly as it related to foreign terrorism. In general, the act included three main provisions:

• Expanded surveillance abilities of law enforcement, including by tapping domestic and international phones;

• Easier interagency communication to allow federal agencies to more effectively use all available resources in counterterrorism efforts; and

• Increased penalties for terrorism crimes and an expanded list of activities which would qualify for terrorism charges.

George W. Bush signing the Patriot Act

United States agencies became more efficient at mass surveillance until one whistleblower exposed their whole operation in 2013.

Edward Snowden

Edward Snowden was a computer intelligence consultant and whistleblower who leaked highly classified information from the National Security Agency (NSA) in 2013 when he was an employee and subcontractor. His disclosures revealed numerous global surveillance programs, many run by the NSA and the Five Eyes intelligence alliance with the cooperation of telecommunication companies and European governments and prompted a cultural discussion about national security and individual privacy.

Everyone has their opinions on Edward Snowden, especially considering he worked for the CIA prior to working with the NSA but we have to remember Snowden was a computer genius. While working with the CIA in Geneva in 2007 he exposed how they functioned as well. In 2022, Snowden wrote a Substack explaining how ‘The CIA is not your friend’:

America’s Open Wound

Snowden described his CIA experience in Geneva as formative, stating that the CIA deliberately got a Swiss banker drunk and encouraged him to drive home. Snowden said that when the latter was arrested for drunk driving, a CIA operative offered to help in exchange for the banker becoming an informant. Ueli Maurer, President of the Swiss Confederation for the year 2013, publicly disputed Snowden's claims in June of that year.

"This would mean that the CIA successfully bribed the Geneva police and judiciary. With all due respect, I just can't imagine it,"

said Maurer.

In February 2009, Snowden resigned from the CIA.

As you can see, Snowden seemed to be an ethical man working in a very unethical environment. He also wasn’t afraid to speak up when he noticed something wrong.

He then got hired as a contractee for Dell and worked at the NSA facility in Tokyo in 2009. During his time there he looked into mass surveillance in China, which prompted him to investigate the overreaching powers of the United States.

Snowden began downloading documents describing the government's electronic spying programs while working for Dell in April 2012 and in March 2012, Dell reassigned Snowden to Hawaii as lead technologist for the NSA's information-sharing office.

On March 15, 2013 – three days after what he later called his "breaking point" of "seeing the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, directly lie under oath to Congress” – Snowden quit his job at Dell.

In 2013, Snowden was hired by an NSA contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton, after previous employment with Dell and the CIA. Snowden says he gradually became disillusioned with the programs with which he was involved, and that he tried to raise his ethical concerns through internal channels but was ignored.

On May 20, 2013, Snowden flew to Hong Kong after leaving his job at an NSA facility in Hawaii, and in early June he revealed thousands of classified NSA documents to journalists Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, Barton Gellman, and Ewen MacAskill.

What Snowden exposed was the mass surveillance technology of the United States government, which plays a major part in how the country actually functions behind the scenes. That is why the government unsealed charges against Snowden of two counts of violating the Espionage Act of 1917, theft of government property and they revoked his passport.

Two days later, Snowden flew into Moscow's Sheremetyevo International Airport, where Russian authorities observed the canceled passport, and he was restricted to the airport terminal for over one month. Russia later granted Snowden the right of asylum with an initial visa for residence for one year, which was subsequently repeatedly extended.

In 2013, Donald Trump made a series of tweets in which he referred to Snowden as a "traitor", saying he gave "serious information to China and Russia" and "should be executed". Later that year he added a caveat, tweeting "if it and he could reveal Obama's [birth] records, I might become a major fan".

Snowden applied for political asylum to 21 countries. A statement attributed to him contended that the U.S. administration, and specifically then–Vice President Joe Biden, had pressured the governments to refuse his asylum petitions. Biden had telephoned President Rafael Correa days prior to Snowden's remarks, asking the Ecuadorian leader not to grant Snowden asylum.

So as you can see Biden and Trump both disliked Edward Snowden very much. The establishment doesn’t like it when their evil nature gets exposed.

Four months after Snowden received asylum in Russia, Julian Assange commented:

"While Venezuela and Ecuador could protect him in the short term, over the long term there could be a change in government. In Russia, he's safe, he's well-regarded, and that is not likely to change. That was my advice to Snowden, that he would be physically safest in Russia."

Choosing Russia for asylum was Julian Assange’s advice to Snowden because Assange was in asylum in Ecuador at the time. Snowden would be in the same situation as Assange if it wasn’t for this advice.

In August 2020, Trump said during a press conference that he would:

"take a look" at pardoning Snowden, and added that he was "not that aware of the Snowden situation".

He stated:

"There are many, many people–it seems to be a split decision that many people think that he should be somehow treated differently, and other people think he did very bad things, and I'm going to take a very good look at it."

Trump eventually never pardoned Edward Snowden.

In October 2020, Snowden was granted permanent residency in Russia. In September 2022, Snowden was granted Russian citizenship by President Vladimir Putin, and on December 2, 2022 he swore the oath of allegiance.

Snowden was able to live a life in Russia because of Julian Assange’s advice to seek asylum in the country. The reason Assange gave Snowden advice was because he was in Asylum at the time Snowden leaked the documents in 2013. Assange made a mistake in choosing Ecuador over Russia because he would be given to British / US authorities in 2019.

Julian Assange and Wikileaks

Julian Assange is an Australian editor, publisher, and activist who founded WikiLeaks in 2006. Wikileaks is a media organization and operates as a non-profit and is funded by donations and media partnerships. It has published classified documents and other media provided by anonymous sources.

He came to wide international attention in 2010 when WikiLeaks published a series of leaks from US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning: footage of a US airstrike in Baghdad, US military logs from the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and US diplomatic cables.

In November 2010, Sweden issued a European arrest warrant for Assange, for questioning in a Swedish investigation. After losing his appeal against the warrant, he breached bail and took refuge in the Embassy of Ecuador in London in June 2012. He was granted asylum by Ecuador in August 2012 on the grounds of political persecution and fears he might be extradited to the United States.

Wikileaks was also the site where Anthony Weiner’s emails got leaked to in 2016, which spawned ‘Pizzagate’. Websites like 4chan and 8chan went crazy digging into the instagram profiles of the people that were mentioned in the emails.

Under the Obama Administration, the Department of Justice did not indict Assange because it could not find evidence that his actions differed from those of a journalist. During the Trump Administration, CIA director Mike Pompeo and Attorney General Jeff Sessions stepped up pursuit of Assange.

In March 2017, WikiLeaks began releasing the largest leak of CIA documents in history, codenamed Vault 7. The documents included details of the CIA's hacking capabilities and software tools used to break into smartphones, computers and other Internet-connected devices.

In April, CIA director Mike Pompeo called WikiLeaks:

"a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia".

Assange responded:

"The head of the CIA determining who is a publisher, who's not a publisher, who's a journalist, who's not a journalist, is totally out of line".

According to former intelligence officials, in the wake of the Vault 7 leaks, the CIA talked about kidnapping Assange from Ecuador's London embassy, and some senior officials discussed his potential assassination.

On 11 April 2019, Assange's asylum was withdrawn following a series of disputes with Ecuadorian authorities. The police were invited into the embassy and he was arrested. He was found guilty of breaching the Bail Act and sentenced to 50 weeks in prison. The U.S. government unsealed an indictment charging Assange with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion related to the leaks provided by Manning.

In May 2019 and June 2020, the U.S. government unsealed new indictments against Assange, charging him with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 and alleging he had conspired with hackers.

Assange has been confined in HM Prison Belmarsh in London since April 2019, as the United States government's extradition effort is contested in the British courts.

Edward Snowden and Julian Assange are known as ‘cult’ heroes to many underground internet movements for their courage against the establishment elite. Specifically on websites with little to no moderation, such as 4chan, 8chan, etc.

The Fear of the Chans

From 2004 - 2016, 4Chan was the biggest social media website that didn’t take in advertising revenue and keeps its users anonymous. This allowed the site to become the central theater for internet culture during this time period. Because of the lack of censorship, it also included debauchery themes the resonated throughout the site. But as a ‘Freedom of Speech’ platform, it valued the people first and the elite last and nothing else came close.

The origins of the meme, Pepe the Frog, rickrolling and the creation of the hacker group ‘Anonymous’ can be traced to 4chan. It can be argued that it represents the last battalion of free speech. With other social media websites collecting personal information / banning users, the chans keep everyone anonymous, which was a problem to the Elite. They needed to find out who these people were before the movement gets too big.

Here is a good video showing the history of 4chan and how it represented the ‘True form of Freedom of Speech’ before Q:

Bottom up movements, that are started by the people and not by the elite is not ok to the establishment. It represents their biggest fear and in 2015 things were getting a little out of control:

• Wikileaks was a true threat

• Snowden exposed the mass surveillance of the US government

• The anonymous hacker group was becoming a problem

• Jeffrey Epstein’s case was becoming mainstream

Maybe the establishment saw this underground movements as a threat and needed a plan to squash it before it grew too big

The establishment needed two Presidential candidates that could fix these issues on the internet. So Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton became the Republican and Democrat candidates for the 2016 US Election. Both candidates were very close to Jeffrey Epstein, which would ensure perfect damage control.

They wanted Trump as President though because he was closer to Epstein than Clinton and ran for the party that aligned more with the chans: the Republican Party. They knew whatever candidate the MSM attacked the most would become the leading candidate because Republicans hate the liberal media.

They used the same strategy to shine a light on Q so more people who hated the establishment can align with this mysterious online movement.

After Donald Trump won the US Presidency, one of his main goals was most likely to control the underground internet activity at the time. They knew that 4chan / 8chan was the best place to start an ‘underground grass root internet movement’ that targeted these individuals who were creating a major stir within the establishment. So they needed to create something.

Enter Q.

The goals of Q were to:

• Dissociate Trump with Epstein

• Create a movement of ‘Trump Hero Worship’

• Force anons from the chans to sign up on Twitter and use Q associated hashtags

• Force anons to become ‘politically involved’

• Force anons to become ‘filled with hate / become extremists’

• Unleash them onto the Capitol building on Jan. 6th and arrest as many as you can

This theory is based on the fact that Q said Trump planned a ‘Sting Operation’ that would succeed due to the Durham Probe, yet the Durham Probe ended with no arrests in May 2023.

Q also said that these deep-state actors would be labelled traitors and charged with the ‘Espionage’, when the only person charged with Espionage under the Trump Administration was Julian Assange in 2019.

One of Q’s catchphrases was ‘The calm before the storm’, and many anons thought Q was talking about the moment the military would take over and arrest the individuals who are part of this ‘Elite Cult’. But after the failure of the Durham Probe and the events that took place on January 6th, 2021, it almost seems the ‘Calm before the Storm’ was in reference to the ‘Storming of the US Capitol Building’.

If this is the case then only the authors and people in charge of the Q account would be aware of this connection while they continued to mislead the masses.

January 6th, 2021

More than 1,200 persons have been charged with federal crimes arising from the attack. As of December 2023, 728 defendants had pleaded guilty, while another 166 defendants had been convicted at trial; a total of 745 defendants have been sentenced.

Think about the numbers above and compare them with how many government officials have been arrested due to being part of the ‘Swamp’ as Trump calls them.

Did Trump drain the ‘Swamp’ or did Trump mislead the public to improve his image?

To answer this we need to imagine a couple of scenarios:

• What would Trump’s Presidency look like without Q?

• What would Trump’s image be like if he didn’t run for US Presidency?

Think of what kind of image Trump would have without Q. The chans would be all over Trump’s connection to Epstein if it wasn’t for Q. So it’s not far-fetched to think Q was damage control for Trump’s image while at the same time misleading anons to ‘fight on Social Media sites’ to get banned / censored.

Think of what kind of image Trump would have if he didn’t run for US President. He would be known as ‘that Apprentice guy who was close to Jeffrey Epstein’.

What’s worse is that Trump managed to turn American protestors into ‘Domestic Terrorists’ with the help of Q.

The Encyclopædia Britannica described the Jan 6th attack "as an insurrection or attempted coup d'état". The encyclopedia added that "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and other law-enforcement agencies also considered it an act of domestic terrorism".

Furthermore, Encyclopædia Britannica classifies the Capitol attack under the topic of domestic terrorism and describes the United States Capitol as a:

"scene of domestic terrorism when supporters of President Donald Trump stormed the building as Congress was in the process of certifying Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 presidential election".

The FBI classified the attack as domestic terrorism. At the Senate Judiciary Committee meeting on March 2, 2021, Wray testified:

“I was appalled, like you, at the violence and destruction that we saw that day. I was appalled that you, our country's elected leaders, were victimized right here in these very halls. That attack, that siege was criminal behavior, plain and simple, and it's behavior that we, the FBI, view as domestic terrorism. It's got no place in our democracy and tolerating it would make a mockery of our nation's rule of law.”

The Congressional Research Service also concluded that the attack met the federal definition of domestic terrorism. Republican senator Ted Cruz characterized it as terrorism at least eighteen times over the ensuing year, though he was among the Senate Republicans who blocked a bipartisan January 6 commission to investigate it.

So not only have people been arrested for protesting at the US Capitol but now they are being labelled ‘Domestic Terrorists’ for being associated with Q.

So ask yourself these questions:

• Was the Trump Presidency positive on the lives of his supporters?

• Was Q a positive or negative psyop?

• Did Trump drain the swamp?

After the Jan. 6th attacks on the Capitol everyone who associated with Q, said the election was stolen, agreed with everything Trump said online was banned from Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Instagram, all the big tech companies.

3 years later 95% of these accounts are still banned.

Was this why Trump was constantly meeting with Big Tech companies throughout 2017 leading up to the creation of Q in November 2017?

Maybe.

So what was the overall effect of Q?

Did it succeeded in labelling patriotic protestors, ‘Domestic Terrorists’ , which then forced social media sites to ban these people?

It’s hard to ignore the fact that the answer could be yes.